I'm reading these reports, and noticing that a difference of opinion seems to be developing that has me wondering --- what do you consider to be a successful comic book convention event?
I mean, I've held or worked on a lot of these things now over the years and each one has had it's pros and it's cons (no pun intended) as to whether or not I personally consider them to be successful. Of course, when planning these things these reasons are not necessarily in the same order... I tend to look at building a show in the following order --- guests, exhibitors, promotion, programming. Attendance is your "x" factor.
When I go to them outside of Toronto to work I generally think a con is successful if I'm constantly busy and not idle for hours on end (say Chicago is a successful con as I'm busy from start to finish, while Pittsburgh was not because I was bored 95% of the time). As a collector/fan my needs are a little more basic - did I get some things I wanted at a reasonable price and was I able to get everything I wanted signed? If yes, it was a success.
But here are the ways that I think events can be/are successful at --- or not - from a promoter/coordinator's perspective:
Attendance
Of course, as a person promoting and/or coordinating these types of events the first and most measurable sign of whether or not it has been successful is attendance. I mean, you could have the greatest product ever, but if very few people buy it then it is not a successful product, right? Plus, attendance is pretty much where you earn your profits that enables you to continue doing these types of events.
Attendance at a one day comic show is expected to be considerably less than a two-day show. Attendance at a 2-day show will be less than what you expect at a 3-day show. Attendance relies on all sorts of things to grow or shrink --- but I think that two things are essential to the mix:
(1) effort - you really do need to actually try and promote your show by constantly reminding people when and where it is and who will be there - you are out there selling the show all of the time (to exhibitors, to potential guests, to potential attendees)
(2) advertising, which is really an extension of 1. Sure you need great guests and you need exhibitors with interesting and diverse products but if you don't advertise at all to anyone but your die-hards, then no one outside of your die-hards knows about what you are doing and where/when you are doing it. Advertising catches the fence-sitters, the casual fans, the uninformed collectors and the marginally interested fans.
If you can't be bothered to do either (1) or (2) then people who might have supported your event will hammer it home to you when they ask you when your event is happening - after it happened. In fact, you are always doing (1) and you cannot slack when it comes to (2).
Exhibitor satisfaction / exhibitor rebookings
A second measurable sign is exhibitor satisfaction which can be measured by the number of exhibitors who rebook for the next event. If your exhibitors are not happy with your attendance or the clientele you are attracting to your event then it's very simple - they won't rebook and you are scrambling to resell the space to new exhibitors at the next event --- or worse, they sit on the fence until the final weeks before the show and waffle over your event - they need to know you have made changes/improvements to get more people in and a clientele that is interested in their products. But if an exhibitor is happy, they can't wait to rebook for next year and support your event. Exhibitors PAY FOR THE EVENT in the traditional convention formula. The revenues that table sales generate enable you to rebook the hall, pay your suppliers and fund your advertising/promotional efforts.
Exhibitors do want to make money first and foremost (even though many are fans and are excited over guests, especially if they can sell items to get signed by the guests), and they are relying on YOU as promoter, to get people into your show who are interested in the products they are selling. Certainly volume can be a factor (creating various pockets of supply/demand on popular products and books), but volume can be bypassed by bringing in quality buyers. If you end up attracting few attendees that don't want to spend their money with the exhibitors then you are not doing your job.
Since Artist Alley costs are significantly lower than Dealer tables, their expectations are a little lower. They are there to promote their products, so they do need people to promote to --- but they also have the option of social networking and meeting others in a similar position that may lead to future collaborations and/or sage advice from veteran pros. If their experience is beneficial in those ways they are more likely to return even if table money wasn't earned back. Plus, I recall from my Artist Alley days in the late 1980's that any money I earned went right back into another part of the con. I suspect I was not alone in that.
(In many ways, this is why I respect the TCAF model in that all of the attention goes to the creators, and they don't rely on exhibitors to fund the show. This was also one of our benefits with the Sequential Art Symposium last month in that fund-raising covered the costs and the CCBCAA didn't rely on exhibitors to fund the event. While I did stress about attendance, since it was free admission the only priority was that people learned something about Canadian comics and enjoyed the experience. Exhibitors, as I implied before, are stressful for a promoter/coordinator in that if they don't do well, for whatever reason, you know they will blame you - the promoters and coordinators - for not doing your job (which is getting people into the event). However, the costs of renting convention spaces are not cheap in the city and if you are doing a proper traditional con then you need to sell exhibor space and make your exhibitors happy along the way. Nevertheless, just about any type of event relies on the existing community/network of sites and stores to spread the word about your event.)
Guest Cancellations/no shows
The third measurable sign is the number of guest no-shows and cancellations. Each year you can expect to see some changes in your lists after you announce them (guests, exhibitors, artist alley) due to circumstances beyond anyone's control --- illnesses, family emergencies, weddings, funerals, holidays, etc. And sometimes these things happen at the last minute and you are wondering where people are when you see an empty table. Sometimes work takes precedence. But if you are doing something that people want to be a part of, they will do whatever they can to be there to be a part of your event.
Attendee satisfaction/reviews - did people have a good time?
Finally, attendee satisfaction. Are the people that are attending your event happy with the product? I know from experience that you can fail in all of the other measurable methods of having a successful show and still have happy and satisfied attendees and guests.
Lack of big crowds enables the attendees you do have to have more interaction time with the guests and exhibitors and since there are fewer people, the exhibitors are vying for their dollars by offering up bigger deals and better discounts. The exhibitor may walk out without recouping their expenses, but the people they sold to are excited because they got a great deal, along with sketches, original art, all their books signed and so on.
Conversely, if your attendance is massive, the same people will be upset with you because they don't have that same level of "face time", and if the exhibitors are doing well they won't be so quick to discount as they won't need to.
A full show has attendees vying for books at dealer tables (creating supply/demand issues) while a slow show can make an attendee uneasy when they are the only bin diver and the retailer is completely focused on them to make the sale. On the other hand, no competition when it comes to guests is great if they are there for sketches and getting things signed. Only problem with that is that once they are done they won't stick around.
For attendees and even for Artist Alley and creators/guests a priority is having a good time. Of course, every promoter / coordinator is happy to hear good reviews because people had a great time. Their positive words will hopefully carry over to their friends and associates that didn't attend, and they will remember that when they learn about your next event.
For years I worked on events simply because I was happy to hear that the people who were at the show were really happy with the end product. But that has to be balanced by sustained growth and stability.
| | kevthemev ( |
July 17 2008, 18:42:38 UTC 3 years ago
July 18 2008, 10:56:17 UTC 3 years ago
Great Read!
Wow,I loved that post, Kev.
You managed to nail all of the reasons why I enjoy comic conventions and I'm not ashamed to admit it. I mean, when I write a review for a con I'm probably not going to talk about how well dealers did. Also, I probably won't mention the attendance at a con unless it takes me over an hour to get into the convention or I show up and nobody else is there.
It was interesting to read about all the different perspectives at a con. awesome.
July 18 2008, 15:56:54 UTC 3 years ago
Re: Great Read!
Thanks Milo. Each person attending a con has their own needs/interests. It's so rare for me to go to a con just as a fan, but when I'm at a con working I need to pencil out what I do need to see/do as a fan. Usually that requires me running over to a creators booth on a break and getting on a sketch list or thumbing through the available originals, or looking at originals at an art dealers booth. At San Diego I try to find out about sketchbooks and prints in advance so I know where to go (or where to send someone). My fan interaction time with creators ends up being more social when everyone assembles at a hotel bar. If a show is really slow I usually end up having time to go to a dealer booth and look around, but my buying needs have changed over the years and I buy very few single issues and more trades/hardcovers.Anonymous
July 19 2008, 02:01:14 UTC 3 years ago
Then I realized we were discussing comic book conventions! ;-P
Kev, there is a small number of people in Toronto that have had the privilege and perspective of being a fan, con-promoter, con-exhibitor, and worked in artist alley. You are no doubt one of them!
It seems evident that there is no 'perfect' system as there are too many players to appease and too many constant factors that even the most thorough promoters can not account for.
I am understanding with guest cancellations as long as it is handled with integrity. Last minute cancellations, it happens....what can anyone do?!?!
As a fan, attendance numbers mean little to me as most of the time, I am in attendance for a comic con/festival in Toronto and can see with my own eyes and interpret it in my own head.
Although it doesn't take much to convince me to go to a local show (barring obligations or not being in the city at the time). I agree, there needs to be efforts in attracting new audience. Who knows when some of the regulars may 'retire'....especially if Joe Q. still thinks Spidey & MJ don't work and Dan Didio thinks COUNTDOWN to Final Crisis was an amazing series......
Anyways, sorry I couldn't be much help, unless....... there's thought of serving beer at comic book conventions!?!
-Danny T
P.S. Oh god! Milo, I think I have that same Hawaiian shirt!
July 19 2008, 05:06:27 UTC 3 years ago
The only concerns I might have as a fan attending an event that has poor attendance would be (a) that awkward moment when you make eye contact with someone who needs to make a sale and you either have no money to spend or they don't have what you are looking for and (b) wondering whether or not they could do ever possibly do this again. I would feel bad for them as a con with little or no attendance has got be losing money. We haven't seen a comic book equivalent of a Con No Baka (an anime con nobody went to last year) or Fedcon (cancelled mid-way for lack of payments to the hotel) or even JumpCon Boston (cancelled two days before it was to happen).
I know you guys (Milo, Danny, Jason) like to hit up everyone at the convention and check out what they have and get sketches, which is cool but I don't always do that because of that awkward moment when they are eager and I'm not feeling it. When I was in Pittsburgh in July there were a lot of awkward moments like that. You know the ones... when the artist strikes up a conversation, and you pleasantly reply but you can't buy his stuff because you've already committed your dough to a commission from one of the other guests or spent it on something else.
July 20 2008, 05:10:55 UTC 3 years ago
awkward.
Yeah, I've been through many of those awkward moments.Now that I work full-time I usually don't have a problem paying for sketches or buying a cheap (up to 5 bucks) indie book. In fact, I actually look forward to picking up those indie, self-published books because its the only time/place I can get them. I remember picking up a book by Chris Kuzma one year at the Fan Expo. After that I was hooked. I saw him at TCAF next and picked up everything he had for sale and asked him to PLLLLEEASE write more. Now, if I didn't trouble him for a sketch and pick up the book in the heat of the awkward moment, I would have never known how talented he is.
Actually last week at the Paradise Con was a similar event. I met Brian Evinou and picked up his book, "Lucy Legacy". I liked the book and it turns out Mr. Evinou is a great guy who prides himself on dishing out freebie sketches.
This is also how I met my good friend, Shane Heron.
Although, I have had awkward moments like that and they didn't turn out as well as the success stories above. Sometimes people can get pretty aggressive when hocking their wares.
Man...I friggin' love comic conventions.